Recently Brendan Kiley wrote another piece in The Stranger lamenting how Seattle doesn’t have a festival like Portland’s TBA or Austin’s Fusebox. I love TBA, but let’s be fair. TBA tries to do in two weeks what On The Boards does over an entire season. It’s impressive that last year TBA had Jerome Bel and Tim Etchells (two of my favrav artist/thinkers), but this year OtB had Jan Faber, Marie Chouinard and Tanja Liedtke doing full-scale productions—one of my favorite OtB seasons to date. In this context, consider The NW New Works Festival (along with the NW Artist Series) OtB’s more than equivalent presentation of PNW time-based art. For sure, OtB’s season doesn’t have the carnival atmosphere that it would if it was crammed into a two-week extravaganza; and it doesn’t have the extensive symposia, lectures, and gallery shows of TBA. But if you add it up, I’m pretty sure OtB would come out on top for in more than a few categories including stellar master classes and particularly, presenting home grown dance talent.
One thing TBA does that I do wish NWNW / OtB could do more ($$$$) is work with artists to imagine (or reimagine) their work in cool, local sites beyond the walls of OtB’s building. I know this is probably financially impractical. But every year since OtB moved to Queen Anne, NWNW has featured an installation that attempts to “transform” the lobby. After many seasons watching gifted artists attempt this and fail, I’m wondering if it’s possible. This year Sara Osebold took an admirable go at it. It’s probably not Sarah’s fault that the festival PR set me up: “experience the mysterious hidden between layers of ice as the lobby is transformed into a dreamlike artic space.” This description, coupled with the fact I was born in the Canadian north—set-up some high expectations. I clearly have different references than Osebold. What I was drawn to were the woolen creatures Osebold created out of layered earth toned knits and hair: a human form and a musk ox moving infinitesimally slowly. I would love to see Osebold’s work again in a vast space. One freaky thing about the tundra and artic, beyond it’s barren landscapes, are its sounds—from the high-pitched whir of the Northern Lights to crackling icebergs. There is so much less noise pollution in the North that you can hear someone digging in his rocky garden from a mile away. The OtB lobby was so congested I missed the “sounds” generated by this work completely.
I’ve become increasingly annoyed by the rituals of gushy performance descriptions and PR hype anyway. Words like “amazing”, “brilliant,” “blow your socks off” (all used to describe the evening’s artists) get thrown around in a way that sets-up unrealistic expectations, unless you are dealing with work genuinely surpassing. (For example “shameless” didn’t begin to prepare me for Jan Faber’s performer sticking a rifle up his ass while foaming at the mouth –my expectations were surpassed.) “Blow your socks off” isn’t what NWNW is essentially about. In many cases, it’s about local artists, working with painfully low budgets, getting a chance to try out a new project for an audience. Every work on last nights program (with the exception of Headwaters Dance Company’s commission from New York choreographer Donna Uchizono) looked to me like fine works-in-progress: work that will continue to be developed, or is an important transitional work in the artists development. Artists need a place to try things out, and exchange ideas. If you like seeing things in their nascent form, or enjoy ideas while they are still being tossed in the air, NWNW is a great festival.
In full disclosure, I have many friends, former collaborators and students in the show. So I’m going to focus on the general. If there is an overarching theme among the evening’s four dance works, I would say it is nostalgia. If one wonders what NW dance artists were doing at the dawn of the Obama Era while the implications of The Great Recession and the possibilities of a swine flu pandemic vibrated in the air, on this night they seemed to be turning to the past. Uchizono and Sandstrom had flashes of full-tilt, pure kinetics, but the darkly light evening tended to turn towards the small gesture. The ephemeral nature of dance with its tendency to obscure, make it a medium often used to evoke loss, absence, the unsayable or the irretrievable. Last night didn’t leave one with a sense of artists boldly pushing towards the future or finding new edges. Instead I saw artists turning inward, to the past, or towards the relative stability of geography. The evening didn’t challenge or transport me but it did (as another audience member evoked in the lobby) leave me relaxed in my chair, happy to let the work wash over me.
Portland’s Hot Little Hands’ Always Merry and Bright seemed drawn from image rather than deep kinetic or thematic investigation. Six women dressed like disheveled princesses in layers of shredded slips and distressed tulle place cardboard crowns on their heads and open large, homemade pop-up books. Their flesh-colored costumes under dim amber lighting at times evoke the image of a sepia photograph. I was reminded of Julia Margaret Cameron’s portraits of young middle class Victorian women dressed like cherubs. Or, Weegee’s infamous 1943 photograph of two tiara-wearing society ladies dismayed by the homeless woman the photographer threw in their path. Beyond these images, the dance’s primary movement theme focused on insolated body initiations and successional sequencing. The movement quality was general, sometimes apathetic, perhaps because the initiations appeared uninterested in space or dynamic variation.
Headwaters Dance Company’s Montana Suite Part IV: 100 Miles from Forsyth (A pun on William Forsyth?) grew out of a cool multi-year project commissioning some of the most interesting American choreographers working today to work with Montana composers and create dances inspired by Montana. Donna Uchizono choreographed Part IV. It was interesting to see the work of an established New York choreographer with an international reputation on the NWNW stage. I first saw Uchizono’s work in 1990 when she was just getting started. One can see in her choreography the refinement of the same movement preoccupations she had back then: inheritances from Contact Improvisation and Judson dancemakers like Trisha Brown. Limbs are flung in quick flurries or articulated from their edges. Phrases of movement contain quick shifts in dynamics or abrupt redirections in space with eyes and limbs often moving in opposite directions. There are sudden juxtapositions of abstract movement and literal gesture. As thrown and off-handed as the movement looks, it’s difficult to fulfill and the Headwaters dancers rise to the challenge. But it is Uchizono’s visual sensibility, cultivated over the last twenty years, that sets her apart. Part IV begins slowly with dancers crouched behind clay basins, wringing water from shirts into mason jars. Then they slip into the wet cotton fabric.
Salt Horse and the work of primary collaborators Angelina Baldoz, Corrie Befort and Beth Graczcyk I’ve also had the pleasure watching develop over the years. Man on the Beach I think is the most evolved representation of their obsessive preoccupations. In the choreography and improvisation of Befort and Graczyck, movement is often trapped in repetitive, inward turning loops. Images are fragmentary and isolated. Nothing transforms. Nothing develops. Everything sustains. A single kinetic image is often sustained longer than anticipated. In Man on the Beach, they finally seem to find a narrative that frames their structural, kinetic interest in repetition and fragmentation by focusing on the image of a man trapped in a singular moment of remembrance. Memory returns in fragments. These fragments are evoked in short scenes performed by Befort, Graczcyk and their three fine collaborators Michael Rioux, Serge Gubelman and Jens Wazel. These men have a theatricality of presence that brings new substance to Salt Horse’s strong narrative images. The fragmentariness of the narrative finds a particularly memorial embodiment in a moment when the head, shoes, suit and shirt of a man are isolated (yet animated) throughout the stage. The shoes slide behind Graczcyk, visibly pulled by strings—a body evoked through its absence.
The gorgeous score by Baldoz creates a cinematic container for the work that the lighting failed to do. I was distracted by light on the shins and the edges of the scrim—never feeling transported despite the vivid imagery. Perhaps this was the intent.
Watching Salt Horse, I was also reminded that like Uchizono, Seattle dancers inherit rich legacies. Both Graczcyk and Befort worked with Sheri Cohen and Molly Scott for years, and their influence on their sensibilities is clear. Cohen was the first artist who ever “blew my socks” off at NWNW. For years she directed Befort and Graczcyk in deep work nurturing the visceral and sustained dramatic image. Sadly, some of their incredible performances only inspired tiny audiences. I also believe Salt Horse benefits from Molly Scott’s obsession for tight, bound repetition. What Scott transposes onto abstract, vibrating stage spaces Salt Horse locates in awkward daily interactions or the surreal world of dreams, fairytales or the past. But like Uchizono what sets Salt Horse apart are often their powerful visual ideas. In Man on The Beach these images are given even more flesh and blood.
Eli Sandstrom also worked with Molly Scott, and has collaborated with Amy O’Neil since college. A much loved dancer in other artists work, it was exciting to see Sandstrom stepping out on her own. Throughout the arrival/RISE I was in full appreciation of Sandstrom’s outstanding dancing and Ben Zamora’s exceptional lighting. In executing her own movement, Sandstrom highlighted her incredible range and articulation. Sandstrom dances from deep inside her organs to the tips of her toes, sending movement far beyond the edges of her body. After an evening of fairly internalized movement, the expansiveness of Sandstrom’s movement was a reprieve. Sandstrommovement’s dancers, faced with the unenviable challenge of dancing alongside the force of nature that determined the choreography, threw themselves full force into the work. However, Zamora’s lighting ultimately gave the work its thread.
Every performance is a collaboration. Thank you OtB for producing and supporting so much great local dance! And props to Velocity as well—soon moving into their new digs. In their old space they nurtured and supported the majority of the Seattle dance artists on the stage last night.
- Tonya Lockyer